A photo of a single salmon, suspending in midair as it jumps upstream, swimming toward its spawning grounds. (It's relevant, we promise.)

NONFICTION, HYBRID ESSAY

When Language Fails and I Exist

“What kind of man will you be?” they asked.
But I had no plans to be a man at all.

When Language Fails and I Exist

“What kind of man will you be?” they asked. But I had no plans to be a man at all.

Ian-Khara Ellasante
no. 7, The Nonbinary Issue
Summer 2022

“To exist outside a male-female binary is to repeatedly crash against the
limits of language, spurring the creation of new alternatives.”
Alizeh Kohari, The Guru Who Said No

trans as in transgender. trans as in the transitory nature of gender, as in don’t get too used to any of this. trans like gender in transit, as in i’m hauling a whole trunk full of it everywhere i go. trans like gender in translation, as in rendered vividly decipherable only in its context. trans as in transatlantic, as in Black gender steeped in saltwater and trauma, as in i’m forever gettin free. trans as in transcendent, as in gender: i’m above it.  

I certainly do trans the hell outta gender, slipping all over that spectrum like a droplet of mercury. This has been my vibe long before transition and it still is now, when I consider myself to be beyond transition. But to be nonbinary, in a sense, means that I eschew not just the idea that there are only two genders, but also that those two genders are polar opposites, existing at either extreme of a continuum or spectrum.

For some, to be transgender means to move determinedly across that very spectrum—or from some perspectives, to leapfrog from one box to the other—which requires a great deal of confidence in the theory of gender’s binary construction. Such perspectives, therefore, make the amalgamated label trans-nonbinary an oxymoron.

I mean, I give a nod to the binary. Hell, it is foundational to the extreme majority of social structures, for better or worse (Psst… It’s for worse. Thank you, Patriarchy.) In other words, it’s hard to ignore. But can I acknowledge the impact of this theory without subscribing to it? Can I accept that this binary structures much of the world in which I exist while rejecting it as a framework for my own life? *bites nails* Of course I can.

I can because I am trans-nonbinary. Though, depending on the day and who’s asking, I might also say I’m gender-expansive. Or gender-liminal. Or genderqueer. Or gender-weird. Or, in some contexts—in particular when I think I’m keeping it simple—I might say something like “my gender is in the middle,” although I’m aware that phrasing frames gender as the binary I otherwise and so often declare that it is not. Despite my string of alternative labels, the increasing prevalence of nonbinary nearly guarantees some familiarity, which makes it useful. Except that my gender—however I express it and whatever I choose to call it—is always already refracted through the lens of my Blackness. 

                 to be unwritten     or to be illegible 
                 to be invisible     or to be inexpressible
                          or to have conjecture drawn  
                 like Black stripes  like barcode  
                 like the shadow of steel bars 
                 on the body      on the being 
                 on the body being 
                 on the being in the body   

Audre Lorde writes, “That is how I learned that if I didn’t define myself for myself, I would be crunched into other people’s fantasies for me and eaten alive.” Word. Still, on the one hand, the ways in which I define myself and the names I call myself are often just jotted in the margins of who I actually am, to be erased and rewritten at will. On the other hand, who am I if I can’t summon something definitive to relate myself to others in the world? How will they know me? What’s to stop them from getting it wrong? And what are the consequences for me when they do? On the real, as a Black, queer, trans-nonbinary person, shouldn’t I expect to be misinterpreted and misunderstood? 

But must I always be prepared to spell out my whole name in order to be allowed to exist?

                 tags and labels and names 
                 stitched together  
                 a patchwork quilt 
                 i drape over myself 
                 the real real
                 ragged edges  and all
                 the mends and seams show
                 names and labels and tags 
                 to rip and reinforce 
                 this cherished assemblage

Many years ago, around the time I was first becoming friends with TigerCakes, s/he would often wear a black necktie. It was skinny and plain, except that it shouted “TRANNY FAG” in stark white Helvetica down its length. Well, heck yes. Proclamation and reclamation and provocation. That’s one way to do it. 

* * *

It seems that it was a long time before I actually came out as, well, not-cisgender; though, in retrospect, I’m certain that I had hoped my proclamations over the years as lesbian, queer, and dyke were announcing just as much about my queer gender as they were about my queer sexuality. When I finally did come out as not-cisgender, I came out as Two-Spirit. 

“I am recognized by my people as Two Spirit (there are many ways to translate this idea and its long backstory, and I was given Wíŋyaŋ Witkó in ceremony), a concept more about accountability than about who I want to have sex with, and my responsibilities include the sharing of my medicine. Essentially, being queer and being a storyteller are one and the same.”

Read more from Taté Walker,
my pronouns are super/nova

When I briefly donned the label years ago, my awareness of Two-Spirit was as a term designated for people who are both LGBTQ+ and of Indigenous descent. Based on what I understood of myself at the time—my queerness, my family history, and the heritage I’d been diligently reclaiming—Two-Spirit seemed fitting. However, as I learned more about what it means to be Indigenous—from Indigenous perspectives, rather than in a settler-defined sense—and came into an understanding of Indigenous peoplehood and relationality, I also gained a greater appreciation of what it means to be Two-Spirit. More than a term or label; it is a role. Two-Spirit goes beyond simply being LGBTQ+ and of Indigenous descent. And it requires more than just my queerness and the convolutions of my family tree, with its sprigs and surprises, with its corresponding narratives full of knots and asterisks. So, with more reverence than I had when I picked it up, I laid this label aside. It was never mine to hold, as family history and reclaimed connections are just that. They are no substitute for being in relationship with and within a community, especially a relationship in which one’s identity and role as Two-Spirit are at least acknowledged and, at best, deemed essential to the wellbeing of the people.

When I briefly donned the label years ago, my awareness of Two-Spirit was as a term designated for people who are both LGBTQ+ and of Indigenous descent. Based on what I understood of myself at the time—my queerness, my family history, and the heritage I’d been diligently reclaiming—Two-Spirit seemed fitting. However, as I learned more about what it means to be Indigenous—from Indigenous perspectives, rather than in a settler-defined sense—and came into an understanding of Indigenous peoplehood and relationality, I also gained a greater appreciation of what it means to be Two-Spirit. More than a term or label; it is a role. Two-Spirit goes beyond simply being LGBTQ+ and of Indigenous descent. And it requires more than just my queerness and the convolutions of my family tree, with its sprigs and surprises, with its corresponding narratives full of knots and asterisks. So, with more reverence than I had when I picked it up, I laid this label aside. It was never mine to hold, as family history and reclaimed connections are just that. They are no substitute for being in relationship with and within a community, especially a relationship in which one’s identity and role as Two-Spirit are at least acknowledged and, at best, deemed essential to the wellbeing of the people.

In 2014, on a panel that also included Janet Mock, Marci Blackman, and Shola Lynch, bell hooks said, “…[A]ll of our lives we have experienced ourselves as queer, as not belonging, as the essence of queer. . . . queer as being about the self that is at odds with everything around it and has to invent and create and find a place to speak and to thrive and to live. . . . And I think it’s so crucial that trans people are so at the forefront of that, because that is where, among trans people, that the imagination is called forth in the reconstructing and the re-envisioning of self and possibility.”  

Back in the early days of my transition, marveling at the multitude of changes the mirror revealed, I found myself often thinking of salmon. I pictured a sleek, serene, seafaring fish metamorphosing itself into a jut-jawed, thick-skinned upstream hurdler. Both forms beautiful in their own ways, and made even more so by the ability to achieve this drastic remaking. I thought about their transformative journeys from saltwater to freshwater and how, for most of them, there is no return to the sea. It was around this time that I learned about Gloria Anzaldúa’s concept of nepantla: “a Nahuatl word for the space between two bodies of water, the space between two worlds.” She writes, “Transformations occur in this in-between space, an unstable, unpredictable, precarious, always-in-transition space lacking clear boundaries. . . . Most of us dwell in nepantla so much of the time it’s become a sort of ‘home.’” Staring at that mirror, I imagined myself as one of these nepantleres. And I wondered about those fish who, like me, dwell in brackish waters their whole lives and manage to thrive there, where river meets and melds with sea.  

                 girl you    gotta let me    
                         let me go  
                         boy
                 thinks i’m crawling toward his face
                 thinks i’m spreading my shoulders 
                 into the corners of his broad back
                 Diana  let me tell you      i ain’t

* * *

What kind of man will you be? 

A therapist asked me that once. Jarring. I wrote and later published a poem about it, which reads in part:

                 what kind of man will i be? 
                        no
                        i will gather water 
                        and offer that to this endeavor
                 then while i am building 
                 and turning     over the earth    
                 i will be
                 like damp soil and silty rivers        
                 like rain saturating the land
                 like shores with miles of sea stretched between

Beyond that, I had no answer. I had no plans to be a man. 

And yet a man I fed nearly swallowed me whole.

I had spent years carving out my space as a proud and visible queerio. Not only did I not want to be cisgender—as neither woman nor man—I also did not want to appear to be cisgender. To do so meant to risk losing the legibility of my queerness, to inadvertently build a new closet around myself. 

not everyone who passes wants to pass
not everyone who passes wants to pass all the time

In the years in which I was read exclusively as a cisgender man, while I was grateful for the relative safety and social ease of passing privilege, I confronted the perpetual questions of disclosure: Who gets to know? Who needs to know? When do I say it? And what do I say? How do I attempt to account for who I am?

those were label-logged years.

                 gender and desire  stymie
                 and stick in the sludge  label-logged
                 so often  the call to come apart  
                 to unlace myself into the mire
                 to point to each fragment     this is    that is
                 to press names onto these sticky intricacies 
                 who do i say i am   when 
                 who i know myself to be  
                 is unnameable

At the queer youth center, J., who’d recently come out as trans, plopped down next to me on the couch. “So, Ian, I’ve been wondering about something. Are you L, G, B, T, or Q?” 
“I’m all of them,” I said, laughing. “And the plus sign too!”


Works referenced

Gloria Anzaldúa, Borderlands/La Frontera: The New Mestiza

Gloria Anzaldúa and AnaLouise Keating, eds., This Bridge We Call Home: Radical Visions for Transformation

Ian-Khara Ellasante, “earth, water, and what is built,” in Hinchas de Poesía 12

Ian-Khara Ellasante, “let me tell  you: Diana,” in We Want it all: An Anthology of Radical Trans Poetics, ed. by Andrea Abi-Karam and Kay Gabriel

Ian-Khara Ellasante, “Radical Sovereignty, Rhetorical Borders, and the Everyday Decolonial Praxis of Indigenous Peoplehood and Two-Spirit Reclamation,” in Ethnic and Racial Studies 44

bell hooks, “Are You Still a Slave? Liberating the Black Female Body

Audre Lorde, Sister Outsider: Essays and Speeches

Ian-Khara Ellasante (they/them) (they/them) is a Black, queer, trans-nonbinary poet and cultural studies scholar. Ian-Khara has published poems in We Want It All: An Anthology of Radical Trans Poetics, The Feminist Wire, The Volta, Hinchas de Poesía, Nat. Brut, and Writing the Land, and has been honored with the New Millennium Award for Poetry. Their critical writing has appeared in Transgender Studies Quarterly, Ethnic and Racial Studies, and elsewhere. Proudly hailing from Memphis, Ian-Khara has also loved living and writing in Tucson, Brooklyn, and most recently, in southern Maine, where they are an assistant professor of gender and sexuality studies at Bates College.

previous
No Cession
Sandy O’Sullivan

next
You and I, We Are Everything
Kalki Subramaniam